Research/Advocacy

About SMS
Midwifery Education Program
Extension and Doula Education
California Challenge Process
Library and Information Services
News and Events
Marketplace
Research/Advocacy
Job Announcements
Search

Contact Us

A History of Progress:

Overcoming Barriers to Informed Choice in Childbirth


Midwifery in North America: demise and re-emergence
Midwifery care is currently the standard for low-risk pregnancies in much of Europe, where childbirth outcomes and cost are more favorable than in the United States. It was also the standard of care in the United States until the early 1900s, but was gradually replaced by the practice of obstetrics throughout the early part of the century.  By the early 1970s, many women were dissatisfied with the medicalization of childbirth and a grassroots movement to promote midwifery emerged across North America.  In  the 1980s, social and biomedical researchers also began to re-examine the appropriateness of the medical model of care for normal pregnancy and birth. Mounting evidence demonstrates that the demonstrated benefits of obstetric care for complicated pregnancies do not extend to most low-risk pregnancies. The obstetrical approach for low risk pregnancies is under new scrutiny.

The history of Seattle Midwifery School: a grass roots accomplishment
Washington State is considered by many to be a pioneer in the adoption of public health policies that encourage access to midwifery care.  The growing availability of midwifery care in the state not only provides residents with opportunities for better health care, but also serves as a model for other states and localities that are currently investigating midwifery care issues. The health of the midwifery profession in Washington State is of national and international importance; for the past 23 years, Seattle Midwifery School (SMS) has had a central role in ensuring that health.

In 1978, when Seattle Midwifery School was founded, there were no licensed midwives practicing in Washington State. Members of the Fremont Women's Health Collective took the radical initiative to provide a means for aspiring midwives to meet the educational requirements prescribed in a "forgotten" 1917 law. This law authorized the practice of midwifery by care providers who had completed a course of study meeting prescribed requirements. The school these women founded became Seattle Midwifery School.

Washington law catches up
Soon after the first graduates of Seattle Midwifery School began to practice, Washington State law makers recognized the need for an updated midwifery law. A 1980 legislative analysis document stated that such a law was under consideration in large part because Seattle Midwifery School graduates were providing maternity care under the 1917 law. That law passed and is the basis for today's law that regulates midwifery in Washington State.
[Heany CT and Malter A. (1980) Midwifery Outside of the Nursing Profession: the Current Debate in Washington. Health Policy Analysis Program RD-37, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington]

Thirty years and 20,000 babies later...
Today, approximately 100 licensed midwives practice in this Washington State. Most of these midwives received their training at Seattle Midwifery School. Practicing in accordance with the Midwives Model of Care, they have delivered over 20,000 Washington babies and have a record of excellent medical outcomes, cost effectiveness and client satisfaction.

The turning point
We are now at an historically important time in the re-emergence of midwifery in Washington State and nationally. Relative to other industrialized countries, the United States ranks high in health care costs and low in terms of health outcomes. As discussed in the benefits of midwifery and doula care page, maternity costs and outcomes are a major factor in this equation and therefore offer rich opportunities for improvement in our overall performance. Public policy makers are taking note!

Major victories
Access to midwifery care in Washington State has expanded dramatically in the past two decades.  In addition, many national and international developments have expanded access to midwifery care.

Times of great change often pose great challenges, and this time is no exception. But the stakes are high; the health and well-being of the individuals who would benefit from universal access to midwifery care are in our hands. We must grapple with these challenges and build on our success.
 

LICENSED MIDWIVES IN WASHINGTON STATE

A number of recent policy changes have increased access to midwifery care in Washington State.   Medicaid covers doula and midwifery care in Washington.  State law now requires that Washington insurance companies contract with licensed midwives and that women can have access to midwifery care without first seeing a physician for referral. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, the oldest health management organization in the state and a standard setter since it was first formed in the 1950s, now incorporates the services of licensed midwives, including coverage for birth center and home births. Seattle Midwifery School's program has recently undergone major revisions that open it to a wide range of students who were previously unable to access midwifery education.

  • 1917 midwifery law adopted
  • 1978 Seattle Midwifery School founded
  • 1980 University of Washington Health Policy Analysis Program publishes comprehensive and favorable report on “Midwifery Outside of the Nursing Profession” citing the existence of the Seattle Midwifery School as one of the reasons an update of the 1917 law was under consideration
  • 1981 midwifery law revised, contemporary international standards incorporated
  • 1983 Midwives Association of Washington State (MAWS) founded 
  • 1988 Washington Department of Social and Health Services recommends increased utilization of midwives in state maternity care
  • 1989 Licensed midwives eligible for State Health Professional Scholarship Program
  • 1993 Legislature creates Joint Underwriting Association to provide liability insurance
  • 1993 “Every category of provider” law requires Washington health insurance carriers to include licensed midwives
  • 1994 State Health Personnel Resource Plan calls for increased utilization of licensed midwives
  • 1995 Office of Insurance Commissioner invites Licensed Midwives to join dialogue with health care plans and participate in Clinician Workgroup on the Integration of Complementary Medicine
  • 1995 Midwives Association of Washington State, Washington State Medical Association, and Washington Obstetrical Society begin series of meetings to resolve scope of practice and other regulatory issues
  • 1995 Group Health Cooperative becomes the first managed care plan to contract with licensed midwives
  • 1996 MAWS  adopts “Practice Guidelines for Risk Screening and Indications for Consultation and Referral”
  • 1996 Quality Midwifery Associates implements quality assurance program for midwives with liability insurance
  • 1997 Medical Assistance Administration Task Force on Home Birth recommends Medicaid change policy to cover home births
  • 1999 licensed midwives in Washington State are featured in PEW Health Professions Commission Report on the Future of Midwifery, which recommends that the midwifery model of care be available to all families
  • 1999 Students at Seattle Midwifery School are eligible for federal financial aid programs
  • 2000 Legislature includes licensed midwives in statute guaranteeing women direct access to the women’s health care provider of their choice (eliminating need for gatekeeper referral)
  • 2001 Medicaid launches pilot project to cover home birth

 

NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ADVANCES IN ACCESS TO MIDWIFERY CARE

A growing body of clinical research demonstrates that midwifery care is as safe or safer than obstetric care for low risk pregnancies, that it is preferred by mothers, and that it results in significantly lower costs to the consumer and the public

See Current Research on Midwifery and Doula Care


Public policy makers on all levels are increasingly recognizing the individual and public health benefits of midwifery care

World Health Organization
"The most appropriate person to care for pregnant women is someone with midwifery skills who lives close to the community. People trained in midwifery are qualified to provide preventive care to pregnant women, detect abnormal conditions in mothers and infants, assist women through labour and delivery and prescribe essential drugs. When delivery complications arise, those providing midwifery care ­ especially at the community level ­ need to be able to carry out emergency measures if medical help is absent, and get medical assistance or refer women to an appropriate health facility."

"Governments need to promote the training of more personnel with midwifery skills, and launch comprehensive training programmes if such programmes do not already exist. Existing programmes may need to be upgraded in alliance with midwives ­ in order to better meet women's needs." 
[World Health Organization.  Ensure Skilled Attendance At Delivery, WHD 98.6.  Accessed on 7/24/01 at www.who.int/archives/whday/en/pages1998/whd98_06.html.]
 
American Public Health Association
"The American Public Health Association takes a position in support of midwifery as a key strategy for improving access to care for childbearing families. In terms of quality, satisfaction, and costs, the midwifery model for pregnancy and maternity care has been found to be beneficial to women and families, resulting in good outcomes  and cost savings."  [American Public Health Association (2001) 20004: Supporting Access to Midwifery Services in the United States (Position Paper). American Journal of Public Health. 91(3): 7-10.]

PEW Health Professions Commission
A recent report of the Pew Health Professions Commission identified the midwifery model of care as an essential element of comprehensive health care for women and their families that should be embraced by the health-care system and made available to all women. They further identified the midwifery model of care as responding strongly to the three values of the emerging managed care system: lowering or controlling costs, enhancing patient satisfaction, and improving the overall quality of care.  [Charting a Course for the 21st Century: The Future of Midwifery. San Francisco, CA: Pew Health Professions Commission and the University of California San Francisco Center for the Health Professions. April 1999.]

State of Washington Department of Licensing
"Certified nurse midwives and licensed midwives have a lower rate of negative outcomes than physicians and osteopaths, which indicates provision of services within the scope of practice and appropriate referral of potential problems to the medical community." [State of Washington Department of Licensing. (1988) An assessment of childbirth outcomes in Washington SSB 5163 Report to the Legislature. ]

Public awareness and use of midwifery are increasing
  • Use of midwifery is on the rise in the United States.  The percentage of midwife-attended births has increased from 1% in 1975 to 7.7% in 1999. 
    [Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC Menacker F, Hamilton BE. (2001) Births: Final data for 1999. National Vital Statistics Reports 49(1). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics.]
  • Citizens for Midwifery was founded by mothers in 1996.  It promotes the Midwives Model of Care and supports legislative and other advocacy work in numerous states.
  • In 1996, the Coalition to Improve Maternity Services, which represents over 30 national groups of childbirth educators, midwives, doulas, nurses, and physicians, created the Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative. The Initiative is an evidence-based document which provides guidelines for identifying and designating mother-friendly birth sites including hospitals, birth centers, and home-birth services. Their model focuses on prevention and wellness as the alternatives to high-cost screening, diagnosis, and treatment programs.
  • Mainstream media attention to the benefits of midwifery is on the increase. From The New York Times to People Magazine and Mother Jones, articles on midwifery and midwife-assisted births are becoming more common.
  • In 1999 the National Organization for Women resolved to include references to birthing choices and midwifery in all policy statements, brochures, and fact sheets on reproductive freedom and to work in cooperation with state and national midwifery organizations to increase women's limited access to midwifery.

An infrastructure of professional organizations has been established to support and further develop midwifery and promote high standards of professional care

Midwives Alliance of North America (MANA)
Founded in 1982, MANA is a professional organization for all midwives in Canada and the United States. MANA sets standards for midwifery practice, core competencies, and ethics. It encourages communication among midwives, sets educational standards, promotes research, public education, and midwifery advocacy.
North American Registry of Midwives (NARM)
Founded in 1987 by the Midwives Alliance of North America, NARM is an international certification agency whose mission is to establish and administer certification for the credential "Certified Professional Midwife" (CPM). CPM certification validates entry-level knowledge, skills, and experience vital to responsible midwifery practice.
Midwifery Education Accreditation Council (MEAC)
The Council, founded in 1991, accredits direct-entry (non-nursing) midwifery education programs and institutions under the rules of the U.S. Department of Education which has approved MEAC as a federally recognized accrediting agency.
Midwifery Association of Washington State (MAWS)
MAWS was formed to unite and organize the two groups of midwives in Washington state, licensed midwives and certified nurse midwives, and to promote public and professional recognition of midwifery.

Go to next page:
SEATTLE MIDWIFERY SCHOOL'S INVESTMENT: Overcoming Barriers

 

SMS lady logo 

TOP